Monthly Archives: August 2026

10 Commandments, Christian Living, church, Culture, Government

Christian Nationalism and the Local Church | Staying on the Fairway with Biblical Considerations

1 Comment

After a prolonged series of articles critiquing some of the positions espoused by some Christian Nationalists, the series will conclude with some thoughts that should keep the Church from drifting off into error. At worst, the ball will roll into the rough, but the water hazards should be avoided. First to be considered are some biblical considerations. The Bible has made plain distinctions in terms of what should separate people. Even in terms of marriage, it has drawn lines. In 1 Cor. 7:39, quoted above, the limit on the widow is that she would marry in the Lord. Again, it says, “A wife is bound to her husband as long as he lives. But if her husband dies, she is free to be married to whom she wishes, only in the Lord.” Let me emphasize the part of the verse that says she is free to marry whom she wishes. There is no limitation here, except one: that he be united to Christ by faith.

There are additional passages that bring clarity to these issues for the Christian. For example, in Ephesians the apostle Paul writes about the removal of the separation between the people of God. There are two groups: Jews and Gentiles. The distinguishing marks between these people have been removed by Christ.

For he himself is our peace, who has made us both one and has broken down in his flesh the dividing wall of hostility by abolishing the law of commandments expressed in ordinances, that he might create in himself one new man in place of the two, so making peace, and might reconcile us both to God in one body through the cross, thereby killing the hostility.[1]

There are a couple of worthwhile items to note from this text. First, the movement among the Christian community is toward unity not separation. There was a dividing wall between the Jew and the Asian, African, European man, but in Christ that division is removed. Second, consider the use of the word Gentile. The people groups included in that word are all of the ones that are not Jewish. In the Old Testament God dealt the same way with all people that are not Jewish. He did not do so based on any racial consideration, but because of the covenant promises that were given to Abraham, the father of the Jews.

To further flesh out the removal of the distinction between Jew and Gentile there is the Bible’s explanation of the way man is reconciled to God, and there is only one way: through the Lord Jesus Christ. In a text that is often quoted to flatten out any distinction between people at all, it is still correct to note in Galatians 3:27-28 that the way of salvation for all men is singular. In the Lord Jesus Christ, none are treated preferentially. “For as many of you as were baptized into Christ have put on Christ. There is neither Jew nor Greek, there is neither slave nor free, there is no male and female, for you are all one in Christ Jesus.”[2] Note the essential unity of all God’s people in Christ. There is no category for separation among God’s people as seen in the fact that they all come to the Lord in the same manner.

The Bible actually recognizes that essential unity both in the area of sin and salvation. It does emphasizing there is no room to create a distinction among people. “For there is no distinction: for all have sinned and fall short of the glory of God, and are justified by his grace as a gift, through the redemption that is in Christ Jesus, whom God put forward as a propitiation by his blood, to be received by faith.”[3] Sin is in all, justification is received as a gift by all, Christ’s blood propitiates for all, and faith is the agent through which that redemption comes for all. But there is separation in the Bible, and there is something to be learned when that happens as well.

What leads to separation in the Bible? Adam separated from God by the Fall. That is the first instance of separation in creation. Before Adam ate the forbidden fruit it was consistently described as good, even “very good.”[4] However, all of that changes drastically through the introduction of sin. After Adam eats, separation happens for the first time. “And they heard the sound of God walking in the garden in the cool of the day, and the man and his wife hid themselves from the presence of the Lord God among the trees of the garden.”[5] It is sin that separates man from God. Without sin there would not have been separation. As noted by Abraham Kuyper, “If sin, as a disintegrating force, had not divided humanity into different sections, nothing would have marred or broken the organic unity of our race.”[6] And yet, from that first instance of separation flow all the other ones where people are divided.

Adam and Eve’s family is torn apart when Cain is banished after the murder of his brother Abel (Genesis 4:12). At the Tower of Babel, God confused their language because they were lifted up in pride against Him (Genesis 11:6-7). Abraham and Lot separate because their herdsman are quarreling because of greed (Genesis 13:7). Jacob and Esau go their different ways both because of Jacob’s deception and Esau’s rashness (Genesis 27). When the united kingdom is torn in two it is because of Solomon’s sins of idolatry brought about by the influence of his foreign, idolatrous wives (1 Kings 11:9-11). But this separation is not presented as eternal or unalterable. That can be seen where other foreigners, like Ruth the Moabitess, Rahab of Jericho are accepted in Israel and even included in Christ’s genealogy (Matthew 1:5). Separation was not permanent, or racial.

Even in the Old Testament there was a way for this separation to be reversed, as seen in way the division between Jew and Gentile could be removed. It was not by removing racial distinctions, but by becoming a worshiper of the Lord, marked by the covenant sign of circumcision. “If a stranger shall sojourn with you and would keep the Passover to the LORD, let all his males be circumcised. Then he may come near and keep it; he shall be as a native of the land. But no uncircumcised person shall eat of it.”[7] All nations could be admitted if they would adopt the worship of the True God and become His people.

The only exclusion that is made is for the Moabites and Ammonites and the reason for their exclusion is not racial, but a matter of sin. “No Ammonite or Moabite may enter the assembly of the LORD. Even to the tenth generation, none of them may enter the assembly of the LORD forever, because they did not meet you with bread and with water on the way, when you came out of Egypt, and because they hired against you Balaam the son of Beor from Pethor of Mesopotamia, to curse you.”[8] Notice that Ammon and Moab suffer from behavioral obstacles which flow from their opposition to God’s people, not any kind of genetic or racial distinctive. And that leads to the biblical conclusion that once sin and enmity are no more, so will the separation be.

The presentation of the church triumphant is not one where division remains. As sin is finally and totally removed in the glorified state, the harmony of creation is restored. “After this I looked, and behold, a great multitude that no one could number, from every nation, from all tribes and peoples and languages, standing before the throne and before the Lamb, clothed in white robes, with palm branches in their hands, and crying out with a loud voice, ‘Salvation belongs to our God who sits on the throne, and to the Lamb!’”[9] There are hints of this final renewal in the inclusion of the foreigner in Israel.

The weight of this biblical presentation must be held up against any kind of exclusion whether in some form of Kinism, race-realism, or anti-semitism. Certainly there is a recognition that there are different kinds of people, but, especially within the Christian church, there is to be a unity among believers. That is because any man who is in Christ is the recipient of God’s perfect love and affection. And if God is pleased to send His Son to be the sacrifice for the guilt of sin for the African, European, Asian, and Jew there should be no place in the church to create division and exclusion.

Pastor Geoff Gleason
Cliffwood Presbyterian Church

—————

[1] Ephesians 2:14-17.

[2] Galatians 3:27-28.

[3] Romans 3:22b-25a.

[4] Genesis 1:31.

[5] Geneses 3:8.

[6] Abraham Kuyper, Lectures on Calvinism, (Grand Rapids, MI: Wm. B. Eerdmans Publishing Company, 1976), 79-80.

[7] Exodus 12:48.

[8] Deuteronomy 23:3-4.

[9] Revelation 7:9-10.

10 Commandments, Christian Living, church, Government, Race

Christian Nationalism and the Local Church | The Water Hazard of Anti-Semitism and Holocaust Denial

Leave a comment

Last installment dealt with the error of race realism, where racial division is hard-coded based on the assertion of unchangeable, or very difficult to change, characteristics that belong by necessity to different races. Again, the assertion that there are races is not at all controversial, but the core ideas go much beyond a simple observation of difference. Race realism is a water hazard that is beyond simply controversial within the Christian Nationalist movement. It is a view which should be condemned. This installment looks at another water hazard: anti-semitism, holocaust denial, and Hitler rehabilitation.

It is important to state again that Christian Nationalism is not a monolithic movement. Not all Christian Nationalists hold to the controversial views espoused by some, and not all of these controversial positions described above are completely without any expression of truth. A person may, without any fear of contradiction from me, prefer people who look like him. A person may make observations about racial and cultural proclivities. They may even make me chuckle in the way they observe them. Such is the humor of many outstanding comedians. But when opinions and preferences are elevated to doctrine that others must follow, or there are sources of pride connected to race, or statements belittle to sacrifice of Christ who sacrificed Himself in the same way for all His people, it is time to get off the train. At times that line may be difficult to discern, but when it comes to anti-semitism it is not.

There are Christian voices who have made anti-semitic statements. For example, the same Michael Spangler who argues for Race Realism also posted the following on the social media platform X: “I used to write off those who publicly opposed Jews as wild conspiracy theorists. I was wrong. Jews are a real and present danger to Christianity and civilization. Much worse than most Christians are willing to think.”[1] One people group is singled out as uniquely dangerous. This from a man whose feet are self-consciously planted in the “Reformed Camp” of the Christian church. Others, more loosely associated with Christianity have said similar things.

Nick Fuentes, is a self-described Roman Catholic, and Christian Nationalist who has likewise blamed the Jews for a variety social ills. Coleman Hughes, in commenting on some of Fuentes’ rhetoric, isolated the following quote: “Jews are running society. Women need to shut the **** up. Blacks need to be imprisoned, for the most part, and we would live in paradise. It’s that simple.”[2] In my own conversations with people who are sympathetic to him, there is often reference made to international Jewry, or some term like that. There is a certain dark historical connection that can be made using those kinds of terms. And as is commonly said, those who do not learn from history are bound to repeat it.

Adolf Hitler described the Jews as follows: “When thus for the first time I recognized the Jew as the cold-hearted, shameless, and calculating director of this revolting vice traffic in the scum of the big city, a cold shudder ran down my back.”[3] In Hitler, there is a sense of mystery, and universal hostility attributed to “the Jew” as a whole, which falls in line with an emphasis of immutable ethnic traits based on genetics. This observation does not mean that Fuentes or other anti-semites are the equivalent of Hitler. He has neither the power nor the opportunity to work out his political theory, so far anyway. However, it does demonstrate that some of the voices within Christian Nationalism share the same vocabulary and tones about the Jews that the National Socialists did in Germany in the 1930s and 40s. The consequences of that philosophy was extremely destructive.

Of course, there are sinful Jewish people. There are those among them who have used their positions to harm God’s people and others, promote selfish gain in finance, and exploited others in their sinful pursuits. However, and it seems almost ridiculous to write this, they are not unique in that regard. It is foolish to assert they have some kind of corner on sin, or are more likely to commit it than other people. Is the Jew the unique enemy of Christ? The enemy of Christ is linked to profession, not race in Scripture: “Who is the liar but he who denies that Jesus is the Christ? This is the antichrist, he who denies the Father and the Son.”[4] Judaism is Christ-hating in that it denies Him as the Savior of the world. However, the Jewish religion is not uniquely Christ-hating. All false religions which by nature oppose the gospel fall into the category of antichrist. And you cannot be further away from Christ than being antichrist. Atrocities can be traced throughout history in a variety of cultures made up of a variety of races associated to a variety of religions. All of them mar the image of the Creator, and all of them deserve the Church’s condemnation.

One other caution to be noted in the area of anti-semitism or the language of international Jewry and those who deny or minimize the Holocaust, or who rehabilitate Hitler to some degree can be included in this category as well: Christians are not saved by an absence of anti-semitism or by historical accuracy of events that transpired in the Second World War. Perhaps these topics deserve an entire article on their own. However, suffice it to say that the eye-witness testimony from Hitler’s inner circle, personal diaries, guards, Kapos and Sonderkommando (conscripted assistants to the guards from among the prisoners), survivors, and observers[5]make it ludicrous that anyone would deny the atrocities of the Nationalist Socialist Party of Germany from 1936 to 1945. However, people may have reasons for questioning the “official” narrative about events in history. Governments and victors have at times marred the true record of certain events. However, it is necessary for the Church to urge its members to tread with caution in this area.

In reacting to certain experiences, human beings tend to over react. People lurch from one extreme to the opposite one. The safe-guard, and sometimes correction, for the Christian is found in the word of God. Whatever voices declare in the public square should be held up against the standards of God’s word. This series will conclude with some considerations of how the Church remains faithful.

Pastor Geoff Gleason
Cliffwood Presbyterian Church

—————

[1] Michael Spangler (@spanglermt), X, March 28, 2023, https://x.com/spanglermt/status/1831347742112625024?s=46&t=7hiGpcl9l9IilWgtZTzKJQ

[2] Coleman Hughes, “Nick Fuentes Knows Exactly What He’s Doing,” The FP | Conversations with Coleman, YouTube video, May 5, 2023, https://youtu.be/mMpUgnAWmTM?si=tZz3XK-y9SmBv7Zm. Quote starts at 5:06.

[3] Adolf Hitler, Mein Kampf, translated by Ralph Manheim, (Boston, MA: Houghton Mifflin Company, 1999), 59.

[4] 1 John 2:22.

[5] A great resource for eye-witness testimony is the book The Holocaust: A New History by Laurence Reese.